Finding the right mix of product and service alongside an appreciative customer base helps every in-plant prosper. Listen as these successful managers tell their stories. This is one of an insightful series filmed at GraphExpo in 2012.
How can you make the changes needed?
Where will you get the people?
How will you train them?
Design is the fundamental soul of a man-made creation that ends up expressing itself in successive outer layers of the product or service. Steve Jobs
Love the Product. Love the Customer. Love Each Other. Phil Larson
That mantra has served me well for decades. Loving your products and services builds professionalism and excellence into all you and your team produce. Loving your customer causes you to find inventive ways to serve. You listen and adapt to their needs. Loving the other members of your production team causes you to believe in them and work to see them grow. It works together.
Ingenuity inside a performing enterprise takes dedication to the voice of the customer in product optimization.
One shop had worked for years on shifting priorities of several companies. A particular product needed in a particular manner eluded their capabilities. Both the people in the company needing service and the people in production were stumped. Eventually, a bright-minded setup tech invented a plan. With some modifications in production and some workflow adaptation in order intake and online systems, the product was brought successfully into plant production. The department saved thousands of dollars a month and reduced lag times on orders. They also moved from a static mode to a dynamic mode. They also eliminated the need for a complete position and the person in that position moved up into a higher contributing spot. What a win-win-win-win! The production team loved servicing the product line and it filled in for a dropped product line.
Product Optimization is getting the right product mix that is profitable and fit to the location, equipment, and people. Make it important. Pricing has to be right. Prioritization has to be right. Process has to be right. Effective turnaround on the products that are bread and butter and keep the shop running day to day has to be protected.
Let’s look at those components of product optimization.
Props: Tools and Technologies
Adding a new product or service can entail huge shifts in people skill base. There has to be time to build the new skills and knowledge. Plan it in. Make sure your budget planning includes expanding tools and technologies and integrating training across teams ahead of product launch.
When implementing UV coating, it became apparent it was not as simple as we thought. Finishing techs were excellent at folding, perfing, bookmaking and other areas. UV is almost an art of temperature, paper type, speed , thickness, machine, and coating. It is certainly a craft where skill, expertise, and art combine. There were many trials and errors before we could brag about capability. However, once launched, the demand was continual.
Custom work means custom pricing. Many in-plants are not set up for custom anything. People who have used the service are used to pay per piece or pay per page or pay for nothing just make the budget work. That can be limiting when products and services need to be customized for one area though not all need them. Budgeted hourly rates, production turns, machine setups, people time in workflow, and supplies all have to be put into pricing calculators to then match to market bearing numbers. This is tough work and necessary. No one can operate on cost alone. A fully loaded cost contains many factors including profit. Profit for an in-plant means allocated dollars for increasing equipment and skill training to always improve for the people you serve.
Pricing reflects value. Value reflects dignity. Dignity reflects ownership. Ownership makes for great results.
A client was ready for custom one-off book production. Anyone who has ordered a photo book online understands the high dollars charged. This client balked at even a low charge. Entitlement thinking had prepped them for simply not having to pay any extra for custom, labor intensive work. Negotiation and clear-headed thinking prevailed and a new product was co-invented for the client that revolutionized sales results for one company. The sales teams received access to custom proposals in high quality book form that set them in much higher esteem with prospects. A simple pricing negotiation between the in-plant and the creative released power for an entire sales team.
Every shop has a mix of people served. Every business unit served and every department has different business demands and workflows that have to be met and matched. This balance keeps the symbiotic excellence for a performing enterprise that is so necessary for complete productivity. New product and altered product requires prioritization changes communicated at every step of the process.
Blow out of your mind the thought of levels of the process when considering priority. Thinking of levels of people will get you in trouble. Every person in the process chain needs to understand prioritization of performance in relation to the other items on which they work not “the president wants this right now”. That form of prioritization is surely necessary at times and managers have to adjust to make it happen while keeping the flow of all the business considered. An open channel for emergencies has to be in place. But, the normal flow of product and service has to have a regular prioritization all can understand.
An in-plant with good service means a busy in-plant. Move one item and five others are affected. In one plant, we had over 250 steps for each print order. From file prep to print to finish to distribute to allocate $$, it all had to be done and communicated.
This is a good place to make a note about humanizing services. A great lesson for me was finding a way to allow the people we served to look into our processes without turning control over to them. One person loved to walk up to the production team and shift their priorities either through smoozing or scowling. Neither helped anyone. I’ll never forget a twenty year professional broken down in my office, nerves shot, and eyes red from trying to serve this person. The person needed influence, but not in the middle of production processes. We altered our customer service approaches to be more inclusive of them and others along with spending time communicating our process methodologies. The interruptive visits went away.
Our votes(decisions) must go together with our guns (force of need). After all, any vote we shall have, shall have been the product of the gun. The gun which produces the vote should remain its security officer – its guarantor. The people’s votes and the people’s guns are always inseparable twins. Robert Mugabe
Executives and directors, I encourage you to protect what you value. You don’t have to pull out a gun to protect prior decisions, but you certainly should think protection. Decisions have been made with great thought and foresight. There was force of need that implemented past decisions and force of need that makes new ones. When you implement change, you need to address protecting prior decisions so the team understands value of loyalty and service. Otherwise you look petty and political and might make some costly mistakes.
Okay, that is enough thinking on this subject. The online book can give you more insights.
Next up will be online support and pdf workflow optimization. If you have an in-plant, Mr/Mrs/Ms Executive, you must make this happen.
Reviewing the cost power of in-plants is important for any executive wanting to make key decisions regarding cost and value and profits. Many make the mistake of simply categorizing in-plant production as a cost reduction or expense area. That can blow costs up in many other areas of the company. However, an inefficient in-plant that has not worked hard at value add may provide cost reduction after all. Unless, you work on the value add.
Profit leaders in commercial print plants keep Value Add at 65% or better. An In-Plant can do better. I’ve seen plants up to 85% where materials are not of high significance. Part of the problem is that corporations and organizations outside of manufacturing don’t get the concept. Even companies in manufacturing forget to apply costing and planning principles to individual departments that are applied to the entire company profit and value calculations.
What is Value Add?
Value Add is simple. Value Add is what your shop produces minus materials (paper, ink, plates) and minus what you shop out and outsource to others (mail list handling, large runs, design, etc…) When you shop out the work, you are not adding value for the client, the departments, or your business. Someone else is adding value. It devalues your overall business proposition.
Managers and executives, no one can do 100%. We need to measure today and work to move it above the 65% line. This is long term value for you as a business. You can be making profits off of this work and improving your single source provider influence in the mind of the customer. Customers want to go once place and get service from you, the provider that understands their needs.
So Where Can You Improve an In-Plant Service?
Simple. Ask the people sourcing work out of the company and organization.
Are there posters and banners and event collateral being serviced down the street for three times what could be produced in-house? Trust me, if you are doing these types of work and not enabling the in-house team with equipment to produce, you are losing money. It is costing you profits.
Is direct mail being serviced outside? Your in-plant should be working to integrate that into their digital offering. If your in-plant is already out-sourced, you should challenge the provider in this area.
Are you supporting online and variable print collateral across your organization? It is expensive out of house. A committed in-house or commercially provided in-plant can make that area work excellence for your organization.
What does your organization need?
Are you doing finishing at a secondary site and adding confusion, less reliability, and production lags in delivery? Think it through.
As an executive, you should be challenging the provider whether your in-plant is in-house or commercially provided. As an in-plant manager, you should be actively seeking product and services that build the value of the offerings to the business or organization.
Value Add builds business value, expands worker capability and contribution, and reduces production mix ups and lags due to outsourcing.
Next up? Product Optimization… a real place to get costs down and profits up.
The question is continually asked for printers, “What is the cheapest way I can print?” Another form of that question is, “What is the cost?”
Cost is relative. Sure, you need the best price. But you also need the most sustainable price. You also need the best price over time. A quick cheap solution may produce enormous waste in cost and environment over time. Printing 50,000 that are stored on the shelf and only half is used is really the price divided by 25,000. So a $50,000 job for a run on which only 25,000 will ever be used cost $2.00 a piece and damages the environment unnecessarily. Maybe you need to run 5,000 at a time at a cost of $1.10 a piece. If you succeed and need more, you can go up to the 50,000 and beyond based on profitability not cost of piece thinking. Chances are running digital fits. If you go to 30,000, you still have only spent $31,000 dollars and have not waste and no unnecessary environmental impact. You save money. The environment is handled responsibly. What a deal. Read the blog. Be responsible.
I’m not saying go out and buy the equipment being promoted here. But follow the logic. Stretch your mind as a buyer and person who uses print when you are talking to those that serve you. Read this blog.
Every organization needs improvement. Every executive needs to perform with velocity and validity. Velocity means right timing. Validity means right area. Over time and travel, it has been my experience that any operation can gain a 25% improvement in costs and performance through some basic approaches. Most don’t believe it. That includes the one that just improved. Yet, most remain semi-productive behind walls of indecision and fear.
The language of growth resistance is well documented.
- We’ve done that before and it didn’t work.
- So and So would never approve that.
- You don’t understand MY situation, we are different.
- Oh, that’s just the article of the week program, we don’t need that.
On and on it goes. The language of fear and resistance is pervasive, stifling, entitlement driven, and deadly in the long run. It is valid. Yes, many times each of those statements has been true. That does not make them true in every situation and certainly does not excuse using them to resist thinking creatively and cooperatively to build new solutions fit to present demands.
So, let’s explore the first area where an executive, manager, or director can assist so an in-plant can develop greater value for an organization and move from being a cost to a benefit. That is the focus. Get the in-plant into a benefit position for the organization. Eliminating costs is a dreary and sometimes necessary effort. Yet, the real focus is to improve the bottom line. The real need is to broaden the gap between expense and revenue.
You Need Print
Every organization has needs for print and related services. The needs vary according to the demands of the recipients of the product or service the organization delivers. The needs vary based on the methods of marketing and sales and support that are in motion and planned. Meeting those needs effectively and efficiently and responsibly with attention to compliance becomes the challenge for the in-plant operation.
The first stop on improvement is workflow efficiency. This area has been overanalyzed in the industry to the point of becoming high centered in detail approaches. Most plant managers and team members have a great grasp on what could be done to improve efficiency. Most plant managers and team members do not have a great grasp on how that will improve the service for the people needing access and turnaround. There is no reason to simply save time and steps. The need is to gain improvements that return value for people.
Simple, Simple, Simple
Loaded in my phone/camera are pictures of many shops located in many settings. There are ten times as many of these in the gallery of photos in my mind. Short ceilings, cramped corners, stacked supplies, dangerous aisles, and overheated equipment plague my mind. Whew! How in the world do we get into these situations? What was that last person thinking when they reduced access to the supplies the operator needs 10 times a shift? It is not usually expensive to resolve some of these items. The human factor becomes the biggest blockade. Convincing people that life can be better and less hectic and reduce costs for the client is the tough road. Trust me. Sometimes a little reorganization of equipment and supplies to fit the workload of the current and planned product production can return dollars in reduced bad runs, faster turns, less utilities, and better uptime on equipment to allow increased volume. Costs go down quickly and morale goes up just as quick.
Smiling Servants Stimulate
Good morale reduces costs and improves revenue. In a production shop, parties and warm and fuzzy photo moments are not the quickest way to morale improvement. Give a production worker the right tools and the right training and a person to serve and get out of the way. The fastest route to morale improvement is workflow blockage removal. You need to “get ‘er done”. Bring on the orders and allow top performers to serve with excellence.
In a healthcare campus, our shop was located next to the morgue. That thought can be quite a downer. One worker complained when a nurse stepped in and asked her to hold a lifeless baby while she finished other arrangements. Whew! Some shops have bigger issues than others. But worse than the morgue was the fact that the equipment was placed badly for heat exhaust and the air temperatures and volumes needed to operate were inadequate. The team was in a constant state of fear a piece of equipment would be impacted and production would slow or halt. No one can be productive living in fear of the unknown. A little creative rerouting of cooling supply arranged by engineering alleviated the heat overload. Some quick rearranging of equipment between 2am and 4am one morning brought more air flow sensibility. An almost no-cost solution gained days a week of equipment uptime and brought pride back to the production team. The doctors and nurses and administrative staff began getting what they needed to do their jobs more effectively for patients. New work requests began to flood the shop as reliability of service returned.
Process documentation is not an option. In an insurance group, we discovered there was no integrated production plan understandable by the entire team. Every person on every shift had a different interpretation of how to get the job done, what was priority, and who else was to blame for every issue. No one really knew when work would come out of the shop once it went in. Ten day turnarounds were not uncommon. You probably have worked with groups like this. They are great people buried in an inadequate process built over time and patched together like Frankenstein with each change in organization need and chaos and priority of the day.
You are not going to get the full answer in this short article to how we solved this problem. But, I will tell you, it was the team that solved it. I will tell you they began working through point to point touch solutions and tracking. I will tell you they talked to the people receiving their services and included them in prioritization based on business impact not personal departmental preferences. I will tell you it takes executive support.
Oh, the team went to 8-72 hour predictable and communicated turnarounds on ten times the volume with the same staffing and equipment levels. You would love to get that wouldn’t you? The cost / benefit impact on company overall services became more than the cost to run the plant. Think this way. The beginning cost was $2000x and the volume was 1000x. The resulting cost was $1001x and the volume was 10,000x. Pent up demand was going to over-sourcers at higher costs. The unseen expense to the organization of many departments having to arrange outside services couple with dollars buried in hidden budget line items was huge. It went away.
Rapid workflow benefits your ability to work on the next area. You can’t get buried in workflow improvements. It is just one area needing attention. There is a balance and every area needs attention all the time. Next, we’ll talk about value add. It has to improve.
What is driving this fear of out of control print and media costs? What worries the executive? Pain points to the problem. It does not always point to the solution.
There is a valid fear among CFOs that continued dollar loss is unavoidable in print and related communications services. Studies show that in excess of 70% of CEOs distrust the marketing engine. The inability of marketing and communications areas to relate expenses back to profitable company growth stymies a financial analysis. Why settle for this? There are gains to be had. There are profits to be built and encouraged. The activity can be and should be measured with a hard look at Return on Marketing.
Another pain point is the threat of new media channels and mobilization demands. Marketers and executives alike tell analysts they are afraid they and their organizations do not understand what they need to know to adapt. They are thrashing and reading statistics of other attempts in similar organizations in disbelief and despair. What to do? Where to start? How much to spend? Will the long term value traditionally obtained through customer loyalty and persistency be affordable? How many channels of communication need to be engaged to be effective? Which will be life threatening if you don’t engage now even if the expense is unmanageable and lacks decent measurement points?
IT Collision Course
Add to those two the collision of IT and marketing that plagues most companies. IT has been the technology driver and owner of control of data assets. A continual emphasis on security and access and controls has made the information inaccessible and hard to understand for most marketers and communicators looking to take deep dives into segmentation and determine relevant categories of buyers on which to focus. Proliferation of disparate systems within most organizations means the data is not congruently analyzed. Add to that mess, the data was accumulated for operational purposes not for human communications and conversation and concern. It is dry and most times irrelevant. To work in the conversational communications of people to people in which marketing happens, the systems of accumulation and the intelligence behind them must be reworked. You cannot take a financial programmer and build a human sensitive interactive analyst. The change does not work in most instances. Certainly attempting to do it in the speed needed by marketing and communications and sales tasks most companies well beyond the capability of their human resources departments.
Late Adoption of New Media Marketing
Face it. You’ve waited too long. The competition is racing and working with new media and you just got your facebook presence online. It is static and not getting feedback from the right people. Forget about customers in this world. Focus on people. It is people that buy your products. And they are not talking to you. You have done something, but it is just not working. How do you leap frog over the inaction of the last few years when you should have been an early adopter?
Summary and Setup
If you agree with the dilemmas posed above, you know you have to do something about that massive print engine. It is a powerful tool in the Marketing 3.0 Blueprint. Trust me. All those other channels need print to bring them to life. That is one of the lies of the technology thought base. If you buy a lie in the beginning, you will suffer and suffer and suffer. Print is not gone. It is radically changed. It is interactive. It is humanized. It is responsive and direct and timed. It is focused and integrated. Using it in flat and traditional manners will get you decreasing return on your marketing and sales dollars. You need to optimize the engine and take quick advantage of the power of customization and integration of print media with other channels of communication. It is not cheaper to skip print. It is foolish. Neither is it smart to print like you have been printing. That won’t work. You need a new print engine that is dynamic, customized, interactive, data driven, communicative, and humanized.
We will begin to look at the six core areas that must be addressed in a print engine overhaul to build the powerful and competitive approach for your organization. You must.
Every executive is tasked with reducing costs and increasing profit. We can forget. The press of managing the budget can get tied into just meeting the plan instead of achieving the underlying goals. An officer has a fiduciary responsibility to increase shareholder equity. You can’t just “manage the budget”. It needs to improve impact on the bottom line.
Print services is one of those areas that just seems to take money and not give a return. That is a shame. Print services can be such a profit booster, when rightly implemented and attached to corporate initiatives.
Last week my partner and I reviewed two university in-plants. They were ivy league and state. In just a few hours we were able to isolate incredible opportunity to both reduce costs and expand profitable services. You just have to know where to look.
I’ve written quite a lot lately about business plans and new product development. Those were the subjects taught at GraphExpo and are being reviewed by hundreds of folks daily. Some of the feedback I get is a need to be able to assess a print services operation and come up with a viable action plan to improve impact on the bottom line. Too often managers and consultants are looking to survive. You need to thrive. There is no reason not to thrive. The opportunities are amazing. Over the next few weeks, we’ll explore how to thrive.
There is no reason to just get along. There is no reason to roll over to conventional strategy of limiting the benefit of your overall communications engine through bad sourcing decisions and coagulation of IT, marketing, and print services. Where you source your print and communication services is a growth decision not a cost cutting decision. You can throttle your progress engine by making this decision incorrectly. Done correctly, you will cut costs, improve service, increase access to effective communications and be a hero. Done incorrectly, you will cut short term costs and produce blockages in your growth and communications engine and frustrations for marketing and sales and the data miners. You cannot grow using yesterday’s wisdom in a thriving world of interactive print, direct, indirect, social, online, mobile, and mass virile and viral communications.
Opportunities to Profit with In-Plants – MyPrintResource.com. REBLOGGED from listed site.
Opportunities To Profit With In-Plants
BY JEFFREY STEELE (/CONTACT/10107135/JEFFREY-STEELE)
CREATED: OCTOBER 7, 2012
Not all is doom and gloom in the world of in-plants.
These are not the best of times for in-plant operations. Many have been shuttered, and those that remain are being scrutinized ever more closely by the
companies and organizations for which they provide printing services. But not all is doom and gloom in the world of in-plants, says Elisha Kasinskas, Marketing
Director for Rochester Software Associates (Booth 237) in Rochester, NY.
“Despite what we hear, every in-plant is not closing,” says Kasinskas, whose company markets workflow software. “But to really thrive, they need to be strategic
components of the organization. That involves being a part of the fabric of the organization, serving on committees, participating in the organization or company
community, and actively seeking business for that organization.”
Phil Larson, President of the consultancy Shepherd OK in Oklahoma City, calls this “an incredibly exciting time” for in-plants that are amenable to evolving.
“You almost have to learn a new business,” he says. “You have to be able to relate to the executives and to the marketers. You have to adapt.”
Opportunities to Profit with In-Plants – MyPrintResource.com <<<<<<Read the rest….